Skip to main content

Could Pitt be it this year?

At least two times after Sunday's NCAA tournament selection show I said, "If ever a No. 1 seed was going to lose in the first round, it will be Pitt."
A couple days have passed and I still have an uneasy feeling about the Panthers.
They easily could advance to the Final Four, they could play for the national title and even win it.
Yet, I keep coming back to a basic premise when it comes to Pitt sports.
If given the chance, the Panthers will disappoint you. Anyone enjoy that Sun Bowl game New Year's Eve?
That's why every round in this year's basketball tournament will be a test of nerves watching the Panthers on TV.
For a few years now, we've been told that Pitt has a team that can go a long way in the tournament.
Here's what they've done lately:
2008: 1-1. They lost to Michigan State in the second round.
2007: 2-1. The lost to UCLA in the regional semifinal.
2006: 1-1. The lost to Bradley in the second round.
2005: 0-1. They lost to Pacific in the first round.
2004: 2-1. They lost to Oklahoma State in the regional semifinal.
2003: 2-1. They lost to Marquette in the regional semifinal.
2002: 2-1. They lost to Kent State in the regional semifinal.
Many of those losses should have been wins. The UCLA matchup in 2007 was a tough one, otherwise, the losses were tough to take.
Will this year be any different?
Well, they've been ranked No. 1 on two occasions, so you know they truly have a good team, not one that is hyped up in the Pittsburgh region.
Second, the East Regional isn't intimidating.
But I keep coming back to my theory.
If given the chance ...
Yeah, I hope it's wrong this time around.
Maybe a first-round loss is out of the question. After all, a No. 1 seed hasn't lost in the first round since the field expanded to 64 teams.
After that, however, anything can happen.
That's why it's called March Madness -- and rooting for Pitt can be maddening.


Popular posts from this blog

So much for Byron the great backup

I never understood the Steelers' fascination with their backup quarterbacks.

They've had either Charlie Batch and Byron Leftwich for what seems like ages now.

And when the Steelers really needed a backup, Leftwich couldn't deliver.

Leftwich rambled 31 yards for a touchdown Sunday against the Ravens, but other than that burst, the Steelers couldn't do anything on offense in a 13-10 loss that puts them in a bad position in the AFC North.

Leftwich, with his long delivery, looks better suited for the Pirates' bullpen than behind center.

He went 18-for-39 passing for 201 yards, but couldn't help a Steelers' offense that looks lost right now.

The Ravens came into the game with a weak defense. The thought was Leftwich could manage the game, the Steelers could find a running back to rely on and they'd escape with a win.

It didn't work out that way.

And it looks like we could see Batch at QB this week -- or someone else.

The Steelers are worried about Leftw…