Skip to main content

Bracket Racket is back, ready to pick your NCAA winner

This is the fifth version of Bracket Racket, my way of picking the NCAA champion.

Last year was a darn good year for the Racket.

Heck, let's be honest. It was an excellent year. My formula correctly picked the championship game -- Kentucky vs. Kansas -- and it picked the winner.

How do you top it? I guess simply do it again.

I've tweaked the equation over the years, and after last year's success, there's not much to update.

Here's the path to narrow your picks to one champion:

First things first, first-round games are a joke: Honestly, no national champion will emerge from this group. And why does Dayton get to host this every year?

The Sour 16: While we're being honest, no 16 seed has beaten a No. 1 seed. Go with history.

Capital losses: It's easier to say UNLV instead of University of Nevada at Las Vegas. It still doesn't make them a threat to win it all. Take all teams that use capital letters off your list (UNLV, UCLA, VCU).

Let me state this simply: State schools, those with State in its name, are eliminated. Colorado State, Oklahoma State, New Mexico State, Michigan State, Wichita State, Iowa State, Kansas State, Ohio State, South Dakota State, Northwestern State, San Diego State and N.C. State won't win. 

Bad seeds don't grow: Any team seeded nine or lower won't win. Won't happen. No way. Cross off Missouri, Oregon, Valpo, Cincinnati, Albany, Ole Miss, Belmont, Harvard, Iona, Villanova, Akron, Minnesota, Oklahoma, Florida Gulf Coast, Temple, Cal, Montana, Bucknell, Davidson, Colorado and Pacific from your list.

Pass the smell test: These teams just aren't championship material: St. Louis, Memphis, Michigan, New Mexico, Notre Dame, Creighton, Butler and Illinois.

Catholic bias: The schools leaving the Big East to form the new Big East, also known as the Catholic 7, won't win either. Sorry, Georgetown and Marquette.

Which brings us to the Terrific Twelve. It's not the Elite Eight, but they still are special enough to get pointed out: Louisville, Duke, Gonzaga, Wisconsin, Arizona, Kansas, North Carolina, Florida, Indiana, Syracuse, Pitt and Miami (Fla.).

Pitt isn't it: Back in the tournament, the Panthers won't last long, let a lone win it all.

Last year's winner didn't even make the tournament, so let's eliminate the runner-up from title consideration, so bye-bye Kansas. North Carolina, an eighth seed, won't win either, so they're gone too.

Blatant BSG reference: I'm a big fan of Battlestar Galaticia, so let's take out four more teams to give us the Final Five. So, see ya, Wisconsin, Arizona, Syracuse and Gonzaga.

The Final Five are, drum roll, pleas: Louisville, Duke, Florida, Indiana and Miami.

It's an exciting group. All would be worthy champions. But there can be only one.

Duke (I can't believe Bracket Racket picked them) beats Indiana in the championship.


Popular posts from this blog

Baseball and poker similar in how action unfolds

The game of poker has received a bad rap for years for being too boring. Due to longperiods of inactivity in a game, players tend to tune out of the game. The funny thing
is, Baseball is also one that many of these same people happen to like even though
sometimes it also has has similar long periods of inactivity, even if those long periods are
not shown on TV.

In big poker tournaments, such as the highlights we see in the World Series of Poker, has
skewed the reality of how long of a process that the game can really be. Sometimes even
in baseball, during the World Series there are long period of innings where there isn’t
much going on, like in poker except one person raising and others folding.

That can change quickly and sometimes just as dramatically as a big solo shot homer. A
player can make a raise, followed by a three-bet from another player. The original raiser
then moves all-in and gets called. Now, all the people watching the event are on their
feet cheering and screaming fo…

So much for Byron the great backup

I never understood the Steelers' fascination with their backup quarterbacks.

They've had either Charlie Batch and Byron Leftwich for what seems like ages now.

And when the Steelers really needed a backup, Leftwich couldn't deliver.

Leftwich rambled 31 yards for a touchdown Sunday against the Ravens, but other than that burst, the Steelers couldn't do anything on offense in a 13-10 loss that puts them in a bad position in the AFC North.

Leftwich, with his long delivery, looks better suited for the Pirates' bullpen than behind center.

He went 18-for-39 passing for 201 yards, but couldn't help a Steelers' offense that looks lost right now.

The Ravens came into the game with a weak defense. The thought was Leftwich could manage the game, the Steelers could find a running back to rely on and they'd escape with a win.

It didn't work out that way.

And it looks like we could see Batch at QB this week -- or someone else.

The Steelers are worried about Leftw…