Skip to main content

Pirates on collision course with 100 losses (or more)

I must admit, I didn't think it was possible earlier in the summer.

Back in June, I think I first heard the idea that the Bucs would lose 100 games this season. In the middle of the month, the Bucs had a 31-34 record. Man, that seems like ages ago.

I didn't buy the theory then, and I didn't buy it at the All-Star break, either.

Oh, I knew they wouldn't have a winning record. That was a foregone conclusion this summer. But 100 losses? No way.

The team traded most of their top players and I still was in denial.

Even in August, with the team scuffling, I didn't think 100 losses was a possibility. And that five-game winning streak from Aug. 17-22 seemed to justify my thinking.

Then, the bottom fell out.

The Bucs quickly turned things around and lost nine straight games, and then their date with destiny was on.

First, they clinched their 17th consecutive losing season, and the franchise is now the proud owner of the longest losing stretch in professional sports. (Way to go, Bucs)

That was the easy part.

Their next milestone, 100 losses, would require losing at an incredible pace. So far, they've accomplished it, losing 70 percent of the time in the second half of the season.

During this stretch of baseball, if you still can call it that, the Pirates have chugged along at an 18-42 clip. This features a 9-19 record in August and a sizzling 3-15 mark in September.

That's how you go from being 31-34 on June 17 and find yourself needing to play nearly .500 baseball to avoid 100 losses.

At this point, I don't see how they can avoid it.

They had an outside chance of missing it. However, the Pirates lost 3-of-4 to the woeful -- but less-than-the-Pirates woeful -- San Diego Padres. On top of that, the Bucs looked terrible in last night's game against the Reds.

That 10-4 loss was the latest in a 5-23 stretch, which could very well continue for the next week-and-a-half.

Thankfully, the season will end and the losses will stop.

The question now, however: How many losses will they end up with?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Are the Steelers the team no one wants to face?

Embed from Getty Images There's a label attached to the Steelers this postseason: The team no one wants to face. Don't buy it? Monday Morning QB thinks so . Andy Benoit says an explosive passing game and creative defense makes Pittsburgh the most dangerous team in the AFC. I don't think the Ravens had any problems facing the Steelers two weeks ago. But, hey, the Ravens aren't in the playoffs, right? The problem with the Steelers is the defense. They might be creative, as Benoit suggests, but they're also vulnerable to the big play. The team seems to play up -- or down -- to its competition. So, again, there are no Ravens in the playoffs, so they can't be accused of playing down. However, the Steelers have to like their chances with the Bengals on Saturday. One Vegas line on Sunday night had Pittsburgh as a small favorite. Does that mean the Steelers could play down to Cincy? I'm sure the Steelers will be fired up. And it is the po

Don't compare the Steelers to last year's playoff team

Embed from Getty Images I'm already hearing talk about this year's playoff is unfolding like last year. You know how that went: The Steelers lost their starting running back in Week 17, then lost in the wild-card round against a divisional opponent. This year, DeAngelo Williams was injured in Week 17. And the Steelers face a divisional opponent -- the Bengals. That's where it stops. Williams has a sprained ankle, and is considered day-to-day. They also face an opponent that has a rich history -- of losing in the postseason. That's not to suggest that this game is a gimmie and the Steelers should book a trip to Denver. This will present it's share of challenges, namely A.J. Green and tight end Tyler Eifert. The Steelers will need to slow them down, no matter who's throwing the ball. But, if A.J. McCarron is behind center, that should be in favor of the Steelers -- also something different from a year ago.

It was a Burfict ending for the Steelers against the Bengals

Embed from Getty Images I've never seen an ending like that . Oh, sure, I've seen games play out like the scoring summary did from Saturday night's unbelievable wild-card game. Steelers take a 15-0 lead. It looks like they have the game in hand. The Bengals take the lead late in the game. The Steelers win it with a field goal in the waning seconds. That doesn't quite sum it up, does it? Not this game. Not the way it unfolded. Let's get back to the 15-0 part. Martavis Bryant gave the Steelers that lead with an incredible TD catch from Ben Roethlisberger. He actually caught it with his butt. I'm not sure how that was a football move -- but I digress. At that point, it looked like the Steelers were in control. Then Vontaze Burfict took over for the Bengals. Yeah, that guy. Burfict sacked Roethlisberger at the end of the third quarter, knocking Big Ben out of the game. Embed from Getty Images But all the Ste