Skip to main content

Why a Final Four trip isn't in Pitt's future

Let me start off by admitting that I'll be rooting for Pitt to earn a trip to the Final Four.

I'll be rooting, but I don't expect it to happen.

That's usually the way it is with Pitt. I've lived by one rule when it comes to Pitt football and Pitt basketball -- they will disappoint you (or break your heart).

This will be Pitt's 10th straight tournament appearance. Over the past nine seasons, Pitt has a strong history of underachieving.Last year, they lost to Xavier in the second round. In 2008 they lost to Michigan State in the second round. In 2006 they lost to Bradley in the second round. In 2005 they lost to Pacific in the first round.

They play in the toughest league and won it. However, their style of physical play doesn't translate into the tournament. First, they enter the game with a reputation of a hard-nosed, tough team, putting the officials on alert. Second, they get officials who don't normally allow such play.

I've always thought the Panthers needed a consistent scoring threat. They needed someone who can get you a basket whenever it was needed. They never have had it. Oh, they've had some very good players, and plenty of unselfish players, but never the pure scorer. That usually haunts them.

I'm also tired of the hype by the Pittsburgh media. Usually we're treated to stories about how Pitt looks like a Final Four team, or this team looks to be the Panthers' best. Then, after they fall short of expectations, we're told it was a successful season. I'm not sure some of the writers in the area have a firm grip on top college basketball.

Maybe they'll be right this time. Maybe Ron Cook will look good with his prediction, Onboard with Pitt reaching Final Four. Then again, Cook thought the Steelers would win the Super Bowl, Terrelle Pryor or Dion Lewis would win the Heisman, and Mike Haywood deserved a chance as the Pitt football coach (this was before the allegations surfaced).

Let's take a look at Pitt's path, which I think is littered with roadblocks. In their first game, the Panthers get UNC-Asheville. If ever a No. 1 seed was going to lose to a No. 16 seed, this will be it. I think Pitt will prevail. Next will be a tough test for the Panthers. They get the winner of the Butler-Old Dominion game. There's a good chance Pitt loses here. If it's Butler, I think the Panthers lose.

However, let's have fun and advance the Panthers anyway. Barring an upset, Pitt would play either Wisconsin or Kansas State. K-State is my pick to make it to the Final Four. Wisconsin could beat K-State and they could beat Pitt as well. A Panthers win, however, would put it one victory away from the Final Four. That matchup could be against either Florida or BYU, if seeding holds. I don't see it happening.

Maybe you do. I hope you're right.

Just remember, Pitt will break your heart.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Pirates opener: A lot to like

I'm a sucker for opening day. I've been going to Three Rivers/PNC Park many years now to kick off the start to Pirates' season in good times and bad. I enjoy the crowds, the ceremonies and all of trimmings that come with the opener. Monday at PNC Park was no different. Except if you're looking at the Pirates' record at PNC. Zach Duke looked like an all-star, the offense looked like the Lumber Company of old and the crowd had one heck of a time celebrating the Bucs' 7-0 win. It was just the Pirates third win at a PNC Park opener. The game was one to remember. Adam LaRoche (!) and Ryan Doumit hit home runs, Freddy Sanchez looked like a former batting champion and the fans actually had "the wave" going around the park. But it was Duke's day. It was his third career shutout and the first shutout in a home opener since 1978. Yeah, it was a good day. It all came together for the Pirates. Maybe there's more down the road this year.

Didn't Antonio Brown just get paid?

Didn't Antonio Brown just get paid? That was the first question that popped into my mind when I heard he wanted a new deal from the Steelers. I remember the details: Mike Wallace wanted more money than the Steelers wanted to offer, so the Steelers turned around and signed Brown to a $43 million deal over six years. That was 2012. Today, we learned that Brown will skip offseason workouts in the hope of getting a new deal. Honor your contract. It's that simple. Brown signed a deal that caused some people to scratch their heads at the time. It looked like a great deal for Brown. And after two seasons, it looked like the Steelers made a terrific call with the long-term deal. Brown had almost 1,700 yards receiving last year to go with 13 TD catches. That's a heck of a season. However, in exchange for long-term security, Brown looks like a bargain today. That's how it works. Or, at least that's how it's supposed to work. Now Brown wanted paid e...